EOTPROTOCOL: initial SCL response to consultation
18 March 2002
The consultation period for the draft Protocol ended on 28th February
2002. Over 6000 copies of the draft Protocol have been circulated
to date. More than 5000 people visited the website on www.eotprotocol.com,
with downloads occurring at more than 100 per day. The Protocol
has been made the subject of several seminars. Interest has been
generated not only in the UK, but in places as far afield as Pakistan,
South Africa, Hong Kong and Australia.
The number of detailed submissions received during the consultation
period amounted to nearly 80. A similar number of comments was made
at the website Bulletin Board. A brief summary of the comments received
is as follows:
In general a large majority of the consultation contributors were
supportive of the Protocol and made comments with the aim of improving
the document. However, some UK industry bodies, such as RIBA and
CIC, expressed concern that the Protocol might not in fact achieve
its objective of reducing disputes over delay. Some suggested a
second round of consultation to secure a wider acceptance of the
Protocol.
Several contributors thought that the Protocol lacked certainty
in its relationship with contracts and case law, and should be published
simply as a set of Guidance Notes. The Protocol was also considered
by some to be too prescriptive in its requirements concerning the
form the programme should take and in its methods of analysing extensions
of time. Others thought that the Protocol could be structured to
suit different sized projects, it being perceived as being aimed
at only the large complex projects.
Many of the contributors who are or represented contractors said
that the Protocol's allocation of float to the project was wrong,
as in their opinion float was a risk contingency for the contractor's
sole use. They also thought that the Protocol should give more credence
to global claims, constructive acceleration and use of tender allowances.
The Protocol's recommendation to use adjudication to resolve disputes
about extensions of time was questioned.
The Society considered the comments received at its last Council
meeting and agreed that the Protocol should be finalised and published
at the appropriate time. It is now planned to publish a re-draft
of the Protocol in early May to take account of the comments received
to date., A consultation workshop will then be held, to be attended
by SCL representatives, those who had commented on the Protocol
and other invited people. The date of this workshop has been fixed
for the afternoon of Wednesday 22nd May 2002 at the ICE in London
and we are honoured that Judge Humphrey Lloyd QC has agreed to act
as Chair of the workshop.
If you are interested in attending this workshop then please complete
the application form at the website: www.eotprotocol.com. Places
for the workshop will be limited and priority will be given to those
who have contributed to the drafting or consultation process.
Following the workshop, it is planned that the Protocol will be
finalised and launched at a seminar in July. More details about
the launch events will be publicised when the arrangements have
been finalised.
18 March 2002
|